| 123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445 |
- From ian Tue Apr 18 23:30:04 1995
- X-VM-v5-Data: ([nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil]
- [nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil "^To:" nil nil nil nil nil nil nil]
- nil)
- X-VM-Summary-Format: "%3n %a %2d %3m %-19.19F %s\n"
- X-VM-Labels: nil
- X-VM-VHeader: ("Resent-" "From:" "Sender:" "To:" "Apparently-To:" "Cc:" "Subject:" "Date:") nil
- X-VM-Bookmark: 5
- To: Debian developers list <debian-devel@pixar.com>
- Subject: Handling of base packages
- I propose to implement the following scheme to enable obsolete base
- packages to disappear, and to allow files in the base packages to move
- between one package and another.
- 1. When a package is installed, and contains files that are already
- marked as belonging to some other package, the older package will have
- the files that have been overwritten removed from its file list.
- 2. When a package ceases to contain any files due to the action of
- point 1 above, its postrm script is run with the argument `disappear'
- (in place of `remove', `purge' or whatever). It will then be moved
- into the `purge ok not-installed' state, so that it will cease to
- appear in dpkg and dselect lists. Its conffiles will be ignored,
- *not* purged. The prerm will *not* be run as the packaging system
- doesn't know what files are in a package until it unpacks it.
- This will all happen during the `unpack' phase of the replacing
- package.
- 3. If a base system package which is being installed conflicts with
- another base system package which is currently installed on the
- system, the currently installed one will be removed first (the prerm
- will be run with `replace <package> <version>' as arguments, then the
- package will be removed, then the postrm will be run, likewise with
- `replace'). If the replacement fails the removal will be aborted,
- involving running the old packages' scripts with `abort-replace'.
- 4. Base system packages may not be removed except under 2. or 3.
- above. (There will be a --force-remove-base flag to allow foolhardy
- users to go ahead anyway.)
- Ian.
|