Explorar el Código

dpkg-shlibdeps(1): fix typo libssl.so.9.8 -> libssl.so.0.9.8

Also fix it in translations to avoid fuzzy strings.
Raphaël Hertzog hace 16 años
padre
commit
fb39a80932
Se han modificado 10 ficheros con 14 adiciones y 14 borrados
  1. 1 1
      man/dpkg-shlibdeps.1
  2. 2 2
      man/po/de.po
  3. 2 2
      man/po/es.po
  4. 2 2
      man/po/fr.po
  5. 1 1
      man/po/hu.po
  6. 1 1
      man/po/ja.po
  7. 2 2
      man/po/pl.po
  8. 1 1
      man/po/pt_BR.po
  9. 1 1
      man/po/ru.po
  10. 1 1
      man/po/sv.po

+ 1 - 1
man/dpkg-shlibdeps.1

@@ -310,7 +310,7 @@ built within the same source package and if the shlibs files has not yet
 been created (in which case you must fix debian/rules to create
 the shlibs before calling \fBdpkg\-shlibdeps\fR). Bad RPATH can also
 lead to the library being found under a non-canonical name (example:
-/usr/lib/openoffice.org/../lib/libssl.so.9.8 instead of
+/usr/lib/openoffice.org/../lib/libssl.so.0.9.8 instead of
 /usr/lib/libssl.so.0.9.8) that's not associated to any package,
 .B dpkg\-shlibdeps
 tries to work around this by trying to fallback on a canonical name (using

+ 2 - 2
man/po/de.po

@@ -11894,7 +11894,7 @@ msgid ""
 "the same source package and if the shlibs files has not yet been created (in "
 "which case you must fix debian/rules to create the shlibs before calling "
 "B<dpkg-shlibdeps>). Bad RPATH can also lead to the library being found under "
-"a non-canonical name (example: /usr/lib/openoffice.org/../lib/libssl.so.9.8 "
+"a non-canonical name (example: /usr/lib/openoffice.org/../lib/libssl.so.0.9.8 "
 "instead of /usr/lib/libssl.so.0.9.8) that's not associated to any package, "
 "B<dpkg-shlibdeps> tries to work around this by trying to fallback on a "
 "canonical name (using B<realpath>(3))  but it might not always work. It's "
@@ -11907,7 +11907,7 @@ msgstr ""
 "rules korrigieren müssen, damit die Shlibs-Datei erstellt wird bevor B<dpkg-"
 "shlibdeps> aufgerufen wird). Defekte RPATH können auch dazu führen, dass die "
 "Bibliothek unter nicht-kanonischen Namen gefunden wird (beispielsweise /usr/"
-"lib/openoffice.org/../lib/libssl.so.9.8 statt /usr/lib/libssl.so.0.9.8), so "
+"lib/openoffice.org/../lib/libssl.so.0.9.8 statt /usr/lib/libssl.so.0.9.8), so "
 "dass dann diese keinem Paket zugeordnet ist; B<dpkg-shlibdeps> versucht dies "
 "zu umgehen, indem es auf einen kanonischen Namen (mittels B<realpath>(3)) "
 "zurückfällt, allerdings könnte dies manchmal nicht funktionieren. Es ist "

+ 2 - 2
man/po/es.po

@@ -11805,7 +11805,7 @@ msgid ""
 "the same source package and if the shlibs files has not yet been created (in "
 "which case you must fix debian/rules to create the shlibs before calling "
 "B<dpkg-shlibdeps>). Bad RPATH can also lead to the library being found under "
-"a non-canonical name (example: /usr/lib/openoffice.org/../lib/libssl.so.9.8 "
+"a non-canonical name (example: /usr/lib/openoffice.org/../lib/libssl.so.0.9.8 "
 "instead of /usr/lib/libssl.so.0.9.8) that's not associated to any package, "
 "B<dpkg-shlibdeps> tries to work around this by trying to fallback on a "
 "canonical name (using B<realpath>(3))  but it might not always work. It's "
@@ -11817,7 +11817,7 @@ msgstr ""
 "fichero «shlibs» (en cuyo caso debería arreglar «debian/rules» para crear "
 "«shlibs» antes de invocar B<dpkg-shlibdeps>). Un incorrecto «RPATH» también "
 "puede llevar a encontrar la biblioteca bajo un nombre no canónico (por "
-"ejemplo, «/usr/lib/gcc/i486-linux-gnu/4.2.3/../../../../lib/libssl.so.9.8» en "
+"ejemplo, «/usr/lib/openoffice.org/../lib/libssl.so.0.9.8» en "
 "lugar de «/usr/lib/libssl.so.0.9.8») que no esté asociado a ningún paquete. "
 "B<dpkg-shlibdeps> intenta evitar esto usando un nombre canónico (con "
 "B<realpath>(3)), pero no siempre funciona. Siempre es mejor limpiar el "

+ 2 - 2
man/po/fr.po

@@ -11460,7 +11460,7 @@ msgid ""
 "the same source package and if the shlibs files has not yet been created (in "
 "which case you must fix debian/rules to create the shlibs before calling "
 "B<dpkg-shlibdeps>). Bad RPATH can also lead to the library being found under "
-"a non-canonical name (example: /usr/lib/openoffice.org/../lib/libssl.so.9.8 "
+"a non-canonical name (example: /usr/lib/openoffice.org/../lib/libssl.so.0.9.8 "
 "instead of /usr/lib/libssl.so.0.9.8) that's not associated to any package, "
 "B<dpkg-shlibdeps> tries to work around this by trying to fallback on a "
 "canonical name (using B<realpath>(3))  but it might not always work. It's "
@@ -11472,7 +11472,7 @@ msgstr ""
 "fichiers shlibs n'aient pas encore été créés (dans ce cas debian/rules doit "
 "être modifié pour créer le shlibs avant l'appel de B<dpkg-shlibdeps>). Un "
 "mauvais RPATH peut aussi conduire à ce que la bibliothèque soit trouvée sous "
-"un nom non-canonique (comme: /usr/lib/openoffice.org/../lib/libssl.so.9.8 au "
+"un nom non-canonique (comme: /usr/lib/openoffice.org/../lib/libssl.so.0.9.8 au "
 "lieu de /usr/lib/libssl.so.0.9.8) qui n'est associé à aucun paquet, B<dpkg-"
 "shlibdeps> essaie de travailler sur ce nom non-canonique (en utilisant "
 "B<realpath>(3)), mais cela ne fonctionne pas toujours. Il est toujours "

+ 1 - 1
man/po/hu.po

@@ -9662,7 +9662,7 @@ msgid ""
 "the same source package and if the shlibs files has not yet been created (in "
 "which case you must fix debian/rules to create the shlibs before calling "
 "B<dpkg-shlibdeps>). Bad RPATH can also lead to the library being found under "
-"a non-canonical name (example: /usr/lib/openoffice.org/../lib/libssl.so.9.8 "
+"a non-canonical name (example: /usr/lib/openoffice.org/../lib/libssl.so.0.9.8 "
 "instead of /usr/lib/libssl.so.0.9.8) that's not associated to any package, "
 "B<dpkg-shlibdeps> tries to work around this by trying to fallback on a "
 "canonical name (using B<realpath>(3))  but it might not always work. It's "

+ 1 - 1
man/po/ja.po

@@ -10370,7 +10370,7 @@ msgid ""
 "the same source package and if the shlibs files has not yet been created (in "
 "which case you must fix debian/rules to create the shlibs before calling "
 "B<dpkg-shlibdeps>). Bad RPATH can also lead to the library being found under "
-"a non-canonical name (example: /usr/lib/openoffice.org/../lib/libssl.so.9.8 "
+"a non-canonical name (example: /usr/lib/openoffice.org/../lib/libssl.so.0.9.8 "
 "instead of /usr/lib/libssl.so.0.9.8) that's not associated to any package, "
 "B<dpkg-shlibdeps> tries to work around this by trying to fallback on a "
 "canonical name (using B<realpath>(3))  but it might not always work. It's "

+ 2 - 2
man/po/pl.po

@@ -11558,7 +11558,7 @@ msgid ""
 "the same source package and if the shlibs files has not yet been created (in "
 "which case you must fix debian/rules to create the shlibs before calling "
 "B<dpkg-shlibdeps>). Bad RPATH can also lead to the library being found under "
-"a non-canonical name (example: /usr/lib/openoffice.org/../lib/libssl.so.9.8 "
+"a non-canonical name (example: /usr/lib/openoffice.org/../lib/libssl.so.0.9.8 "
 "instead of /usr/lib/libssl.so.0.9.8) that's not associated to any package, "
 "B<dpkg-shlibdeps> tries to work around this by trying to fallback on a "
 "canonical name (using B<realpath>(3))  but it might not always work. It's "
@@ -11571,7 +11571,7 @@ msgstr ""
 "poprawić debian/rules aby shlibs były tworzone przed wywołaniem B<dpkg-"
 "shlibdeps>). Niewłaściwa wartość RPATH może również powodować, że biblioteka "
 "zostanie odnaleziona pod nietypową nazwą, która nie jest związana z żadnym "
-"pakietem (np. /usr/lib/openoffice.org/../lib/libssl.so.9.8 zamiast /usr/lib/"
+"pakietem (np. /usr/lib/openoffice.org/../lib/libssl.so.0.9.8 zamiast /usr/lib/"
 "libssl.so.0.9.8). B<dpkg-shlibdeps> próbuje poradzić sobie z tym starając "
 "się odczytać nazwę kanoniczną (z użyciem B<realpath>(3)) ale może to nie "
 "zawsze zadziałać. Aby uniknąć problemów, najlepiej jest zawsze doprowadzić "

+ 1 - 1
man/po/pt_BR.po

@@ -9819,7 +9819,7 @@ msgid ""
 "the same source package and if the shlibs files has not yet been created (in "
 "which case you must fix debian/rules to create the shlibs before calling "
 "B<dpkg-shlibdeps>). Bad RPATH can also lead to the library being found under "
-"a non-canonical name (example: /usr/lib/openoffice.org/../lib/libssl.so.9.8 "
+"a non-canonical name (example: /usr/lib/openoffice.org/../lib/libssl.so.0.9.8 "
 "instead of /usr/lib/libssl.so.0.9.8) that's not associated to any package, "
 "B<dpkg-shlibdeps> tries to work around this by trying to fallback on a "
 "canonical name (using B<realpath>(3))  but it might not always work. It's "

+ 1 - 1
man/po/ru.po

@@ -9959,7 +9959,7 @@ msgid ""
 "the same source package and if the shlibs files has not yet been created (in "
 "which case you must fix debian/rules to create the shlibs before calling "
 "B<dpkg-shlibdeps>). Bad RPATH can also lead to the library being found under "
-"a non-canonical name (example: /usr/lib/openoffice.org/../lib/libssl.so.9.8 "
+"a non-canonical name (example: /usr/lib/openoffice.org/../lib/libssl.so.0.9.8 "
 "instead of /usr/lib/libssl.so.0.9.8) that's not associated to any package, "
 "B<dpkg-shlibdeps> tries to work around this by trying to fallback on a "
 "canonical name (using B<realpath>(3))  but it might not always work. It's "

+ 1 - 1
man/po/sv.po

@@ -11583,7 +11583,7 @@ msgid ""
 "the same source package and if the shlibs files has not yet been created (in "
 "which case you must fix debian/rules to create the shlibs before calling "
 "B<dpkg-shlibdeps>). Bad RPATH can also lead to the library being found under "
-"a non-canonical name (example: /usr/lib/openoffice.org/../lib/libssl.so.9.8 "
+"a non-canonical name (example: /usr/lib/openoffice.org/../lib/libssl.so.0.9.8 "
 "instead of /usr/lib/libssl.so.0.9.8) that's not associated to any package, "
 "B<dpkg-shlibdeps> tries to work around this by trying to fallback on a "
 "canonical name (using B<realpath>(3))  but it might not always work. It's "